AFCA Overrules Insurer in Camper Trailer Damage Case

2

Initially, the camper owner noticed no damage during usage in early November 2023, only to uncover water damage in April the following year. The insurer, RAA Insurance, asserted that the seals of the camper had deteriorated over time, thereby excluding it from coverage under clauses related to "depreciation, wear and tear, rust, corrosion," as well as "deteriorated seals and joints over a number of incidents."

The AFCA reviewed evidence from the insurer's assessor, which included images showing gaps in the seals where they did not align perfectly with the camper body. Despite these submissions, the authority found that the images and other evidence failed to incontrovertibly establish the alleged deterioration. They identified a lack of definitive indicators, such as holes or cracking, that would typically signal such decline.

In the ruling, an AFCA ombudsman remarked that, while deterioration is indeed a gradual process, the insurer did not provide persuasive evidence establishing that deterioration was the primary cause of the damage. The decision placed the burden of proof on the insurer, requiring clear information detailing the condition of the seals and how it led to the damage.

Consequently, AFCA mandated the insurer to approve the claim and arrange for repairs. Should they opt for a cash settlement, a 15% increase over the repair quotation must be paid. This decision underscores the obligation of insurers to substantiate exclusions in policy claims with compelling evidence.

Published:Monday, 9th Jun 2025
Source: Paige Estritori

Share this news item:

Insurance News

Clear

AFCA Upholds Insurance Fraud Ruling Over Disputed Possum Accident 26 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori A motorist's claim that he crashed into a tree to avoid a possum has been denied by the Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA), which supported the insurer's fraud decision. The incident involved the driver crashing his Jeep—insured for over $20,000—on a dimly-lit street, purportedly avoiding the rain-soaked motorway en route to the store. - read more

Code Watchdog Criticises Insurer for Misleading Rejection Letters 24 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori The Life Code Compliance Committee has recently reprimanded a life insurance provider for issuing misleading rejection letters to policy applicants. These letters were deemed 'ambiguous and contradictory' and failed to clearly inform applicants of their review options after being denied coverage. - read more

Insurer Ordered to Pay Full Claim for Confusing Patio Coverage 23 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori A recent ruling mandates that an insurer must fully honor a storm-related claim due to ambiguous policy wording regarding items in open areas. The Australian Financial Complaints Authority (AFCA) determined that the insurer's restriction on coverage for items in a patio area was unfounded, as the policy's phrasing was not clear. - read more

Australia Sees Dramatic Drop in Catastrophe Losses 23 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori Last year saw Australia's insured catastrophe losses plummet to just $500 million, marking the lowest level since 2004, according to Aon's latest Climate and Catastrophe Insight report. Notably, the Insurance Council of Australia reported no disasters for the year, a situation not seen since 1982. This comes in stark contrast to 2023, when disaster-related insured losses soared to over $3.6 billion. - read more

Half a Million Australian Homes at Risk of Becoming Uninsurable, Climate Agency Reports 21 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori The Climate Change Authority has released a concerning report highlighting that, without immediate intervention, extreme natural hazards could cost Australians approximately $8.7 billion annually by 2050. The report urges the federal government to spearhead a comprehensive and well-coordinated national adaptation agenda to mitigate these risks. - read more

Red Sea Unrest: Insurer Denies Cruise Cancellation Claim 20 Jun 2025: Paige Estritori An Australian travel policyholder has been denied a claim payout after his planned cruise in the Red Sea was cancelled due to conflict. The insurer, Southern Cross, invoked its policy's war and violence exclusion clause, as disturbances in the region were linked to military activities, rendering the claim invalid. - read more